What Is Gender Reassignment Discrimination Meaning

It is therefore important that NHS bodies ensure that they have adequate training and policies in place for the prevention of discrimination against transgender employees or service users.

The two key pieces of legislation that protect transsexual people are the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010) and the Gender Recognition Act 2004 (GRA 2004).

The Equality Act 2010

Discrimination under the EqA 2010

The EqA 2010 provides legal protection from discrimination and harassment. Gender reassignment is one of the nine protected characteristics covered by the Act. A person has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment if that person is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning their sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex.

Under the Act, a reference to a person who has the protected characteristic of gender reassignment is a reference to a transsexual person. Therefore, a woman making the transition to being a man and a man making the transition to being a woman both share the characteristic of gender reassignment.

A key point to note about the definition of gender reassignment under the EqA 2010, is that a person who ‘is proposing to undergo’ the process of changing their sex is protected i.e. they need not have undertaken any actual steps towards the process of transitioning. Further, a person living in the opposite gender without having undergone any medical procedures will be protected. Unlike earlier legislation, there is no requirement to be under medical supervision to qualify for protection under the EqA 2010.

There are five types of prohibited discrimination in respect of gender reassignment:

  • Direct discrimination – when a transsexual person is treated less favourably than others because of gender reassignment
  • Indirect discrimination – where a transsexual person is particularly disadvantaged by a provision, criterion or practice which applies to everyone
  • Harassment – when unwanted conduct related to gender reassignment causes an intimidating, hostile, humiliating or offensive environment for that person
  • Victimisation – when a person is subjected to a detriment because they have made or supported a complaint about gender reassignment discrimination
  • Absences from work – where an employee is treated less favourably in relation to absences from work because of gender reassignment. This is the only type of prohibited discrimination specific to transsexual people

Case example

One issue that employers are likely to face in relation to transsexual employees is use of single-sex facilities. For example, it is likely, and understandably so, that person will want to use the toilet facilities of the gender to which they are transitioning. In the leading authority on this issue Croft -v- Royal Mail Group plc [2003], the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of an employment tribunal that it was not discrimination to require a pre-operative male to female transsexual employee to use the disabled toilet as opposed to the female toilet facilities during the transition process.

However, the approach in this case should not be regarded as best practice. The recruitment and retention of transgender staff guidance issued by the Government Equalities Office (GEO) Guide states that a trans person should be free to select the facilities appropriate to the gender in which they present and that when a trans person starts to live in their acquired gender role on a full-time basis they should have the right to use the facilities for that gender. Further, the Department of Health Guidance for NHS Trusts sets out that it is not good practice to require a transsexual person to use the disabled facilities and it is not acceptable to require a transsexual person to use the facilities of their assigned gender.

Exceptions: when gender reassignment discrimination may be lawful

Gender reassignment discrimination may be permitted in certain limited circumstances. The EqA 2010 provides for an ‘occupational requirement’ exception that employers can rely on in discrimination claims. This enables employers, in limited circumstances, to require that, having regard to the nature or context of the work, only people who are not transsexuals can do the job. The explanatory notes in the EqA 2010 give the following example of an occupational requirement; ‘a counsellor working with victims of rape might have to be a woman and not a transsexual person, even if she has a gender recognition certificate, in order to avoid causing victims further distress.’ This may also apply to NHS staff employed to help victims of rape or other sexual assault.

Application to the NHS

In addition to NHS employees, patients must not be subjected to discrimination by NHS Trusts. The EqA 2010 prohibits discrimination by a service provider (concerned with the provision of a service to the public) against a person requiring the service. Therefore, NHS trusts must not discriminate against transsexual patients because they have the protected characteristic of gender reassignment.

However, there is an exception in the Act for single-sex only services (for example, a group counselling session provided only for female victims of sexual assault) but NHS trusts must be certain that the provision of separate services is a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

NHS bodies must also have regard to the Public Sector Equality Duty set out in Section 149 EqA 2010, which sets out that they must have due regard to eliminating discrimination prohibited by the EqA 2010 and advancing equality of opportunity and fostering good relations between those who share a protected characteristic and people who do not share it.

Gender Recognition Act 2004

The Gender Recognition Act 2004 (the Act) allows transsexual people to gain legal recognition of their acquired gender by registering for a Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC). The application is made to the Gender Recognition Panel who will determine whether a GRC should be issued on the basis that the applicant has lived in their acquired gender for two years and intends to live the acquired gender until death. An applicant does not have to have had gender reassignment surgery, but have been diagnosed as gender dysphoric. Where a full GRC has been issued to a person, their gender becomes for all purposes the acquired gender.

Prohibition on disclosure of information

The Act has important implications for NHS trusts, particularly in relation to the provisions on prohibition of disclosure of information relating to a person’s application for a GRC or, if a GRC is issued, their previous gender. Under section 22 of the Act, it is a criminal offence for a person who has acquired, in an official capacity, protected information regarding an individual’s gender identity to disclose that information to any other person. This clearly affects NHS bodies as employers and in the supply of services to the public, as they are likely to acquire such information in relation to their employees or patients.

An example provided by the workplace and gender reassignment: Guide for staff and managers (a:gender Guide) is of someone working in HR with access to an employee's personal file, disclosing the fact that the employee was born a different gender, without the employee's prior consent.

Potential defences

There are a number of defences to this prohibition set out in section 22(4) of the Act. These include where the information does not enable that person to be identified and where the person has agreed to the disclosure of the information.

In addition, there is a further defence which will have particular importance to NHS bodies as service providers. The Gender Recognition (Disclosure of Information) (England, Wales and Northern Ireland) (No2) Order 2005 provides a defence in relation to disclosure for medical purposes. It will not be an offence under section 22 of the Act to disclosure protected information if the disclosure is made to a health professional, for medical purposes, and the person making the disclosure reasonably believes that the subject has given consent to the disclosure or cannot give such consent.

Practical considerations for NHS bodies

The a:gender Guide states that ‘it is the antithesis of the intentions of the privacy provision included in the GRA 2004 to ask or expect an individual to evidence they have gender recognition. Given the wider privacy protection applicable to all, it is best practice to assume any transsexual person has gender recognition and treat them accordingly’.

Care should be taken to use appropriate names and terminology in HR and patient records in relation to transsexual people. Where a person is transgender, it is important not to refer to this fact in patient or HR records unless the person has consented to it. In respect of employees, this may involve issuing them with a new set of HR records.

In relation to transgender patients, NHS/Department of Health guidance is that they should be issued with a new set of medical records to reflect their new gender status. NHS trusts may find themselves in a difficult position when there are medical reasons why a transgender patient’s previous gender needs to be referred to. In these circumstances, the medical professionals should seek consent from the patient for their gender history being recorded in their notes and steps should be taken to ensure that access to those notes is limited to those who need to be aware of the patient’s gender history for clinical reasons.

Department of Health guidance recommends that all staff are trained on these issues in relation to transgender patients and employees. Our specialist employment team can provide training on the legislation in this area and its implications for NHS bodies.

Gender reassignment is a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010. This means that transgender men and women are protected against discrimination at work.

Gender reassignment is defined as someone who is proposing to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process (or part of a process) for the purpose of reassigning his or her sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex. It is not necessary for the individual to be under medical supervision or undergoing surgery.

The definition covers a woman who has decided to live permanently as a man, but has not and will not undergo any surgical or medical procedures or treatments.

How to manage gender identity in the workplace

It can be difficult for employers to know where to find information on supporting trans employees in the workplace. Clare...

Primark faces £47k bill for ‘shocking’ transgender discrimination

13 Feb 2018

An employment tribunal has told Primark to adopt a policy on how to deal with transgender staff after it found...

Continue Reading•

Six ways to be more inclusive of transgender people in the workplace

11 Oct 2017

HR has a key role in preventing discrimination against transgender people. Jennie Kermode, author of a new book on transgender...

Continue Reading•

Trans employees need better support at work, says Acas

25 Aug 2017

Managers are failing to support trans employees as much as they could in the workplace, a study by Acas has...

Continue Reading•

Sexual orientation discrimination at work: Timeline

6 Jul 2017

In July 1967, the Sexual Offences Act 1967 partially decriminalised homosexuality in England and Wales. To mark the 50th anniversary...

Continue Reading•

Gender reassignment: trans customer wins toilet sign claim

27 May 2016

A ferry company has updated its toilet door signs to use symbols rather than words and carried out diversity awareness...

Continue Reading•

EU referendum: 12 European cases that have shaped UK employment law

31 Mar 2016

The “Brexit” referendum on whether or not the UK should withdraw from the European Union takes place on 23 June...

Continue Reading•

Transgender employees: towards equal treatment

15 Mar 2016

Despite new guidance on recruiting and retaining transgender staff, employers remain confused about the law and good practice. Virginia Matthews...

Continue Reading•

The 10 most important employment law cases in 2015

7 Dec 2015

What were the most significant employment case law decisions in 2015? We count down the 10 most important judgments for employers this year.

Continue Reading•

Netflix and Facebook offer gender reassignment as employee benefit

25 Sep 2015

Gender reassignment procedures are increasingly being offered as an employee benefit, it has been revealed.
Both Facebook and Netflix now...

Continue Reading•

Transgender employees: how to avoid discrimination

28 Aug 2015

Recent employment law cases highlight the risk of poor policies and practices relating to transgender employees. Meanwhile, celebrities such as...

Continue Reading•

Weekly dilemma: Gender reassignment

16 May 2011

One of my employees has told me that he is about to undergo gender-reassignment surgery. This is setting off all...

Continue Reading•

Equality Act 2010: dual discrimination provisions delayed

16 Feb 2011

The Government has confirmed that the dual discrimination provisions under the Equality Act 2010 will not be implemented in April...

Continue Reading•

Confusion remains as Equality Act comes into force

1 Oct 2010

Almost half of Personnel Today readers are still unsure about the implications of the Equality Act 2010, according to findings...

Continue Reading•

Government confirms 1 October implementation of Equality Act

22 Sep 2010

The Government yesterday confirmed that the main provisions of the Equality Act 2010 will come into force on 1 October...

Continue Reading•

0 thoughts on “What Is Gender Reassignment Discrimination Meaning”


Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *